This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Premises Liability
Trip and Fall

Billie Thomas v. Rolling Hills Memorial Park

Published: Jun. 10, 2006 | Result Date: Mar. 28, 2006 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: C0501789 Settlement –  $480,000

Arbitrator

Chris P. Lavdiotis

Court

Contra Costa Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Steven James Choi


Defendant

Richard Allen Levine


Experts

Plaintiff

Carol R. Hyland M.A.
(medical)

Richard A. Nolan
(medical)

Facts

Plaintiff Billie Thomas was at defendant Rolling Hills Memorial Park in Richmond. He tripped over a sprinkler and tore his knee. There were several witnesses to plaintiff's fall. The plaintiff sued defendant for premises liability.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff contended that the sprinkler was concealed by strands of overgrown grass, which was a dangerous condition. Plaintiff's fall could have been prevented if the sprinkler was in a more elevated and visible location.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendant contended that the sprinkler was in plain view. Further, the plaintiff should have been paying closer attention to his steps.

Specials in Evidence

$140,000 The plaintiff sought in excess of $80,000 for future medication, doctor visits, home care and transportation amenities. This was based on a five-year life expectancy.

Injuries

The plaintiff had a total knee replacement. He stayed in the hospital for several days after his operation, from which he suffered complications. The knee replacement caused his deep vein thrombosis condition to flare up again. The plaintiff claimed continued weakness and immobility in the knee. He required a scooter for personal mobility, as well as support and safety amenities inside his home.

Result

The parties settled for $480,000.


#119021

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390