This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Negligence
Skydiving Accident

Christian Barton v. Bill Dause, Parachute Center

Published: Mar. 20, 2010 | Result Date: Jan. 27, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CV034817 Verdict –  Defense

Court

San Joaquin Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michael B. Goldstein


Defendant

Kurt H. Siebert


Experts

Plaintiff

Mike Turoff
(technical)

Defendant

Dennis M. Murphy
(technical)

Facts

In 2006, plaintiff Christian Barton, a seasoned skydiver, conducted a 3,000-foot jump near Acampo during which he struck the tail of the plane from which he jumped, which was operated by defendant Bill Dause. Barton was knocked unconscious. His safety chute deployed and he landed safely.
Barton sued Dause and his company, defendant Parachute Center.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Barton alleged that Dause flew the plane in a manner inconsistent with standards. He contended that Dause should have slowed and leveled the plane before the jump. Barton also contended that Dause also should have given warning about the climb of the plane so that Barton could avoid the tail. Barton claimed that Dause's actions and lack of actions caused Barton's injury. Barton contended that he himself had jumped out of the plane properly. Finally, Barton contended that Parachute Center was vicariously liable for Dause's negligence.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defense contended that Barton was reckless and improperly jumped up from the exit, instead of out of it. The defense further contended that Barton was also aware of the risks associated with skydiving. The defense argued that the only way a tail strike could have occurred was if Barton had improperly jumped. The defense contended that the manner in which Dause piloted the aircraft did not increase the risks inherent in the sport of skydiving.

Damages

The injury, Barton claimed, prevented him from finding a job. Part time work was the only work he was suited for. Barton sough damages for medical bills, pain and suffering, and both past and future lost wages in the amount of $8 million.

Injuries

Barton claimed vertebra fractures, initially resulting in paraplegia. Surgery was required, allowing him to walk again. Barton still suffered paraparesis and was unable to continue participating his recreation activities. Barton also claimed walking difficulties and difficulty completing daily tasks.

Result

The jury returned a verdict for the defense.

Deliberation

two days

Poll

10-2

Length

six days


#119133

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390