This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property
Landlord and Tenant
Commercial Lease

Barmas Inc. v. Michael Segal, et al.

Published: May 15, 2010 | Result Date: Nov. 24, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC396326 Verdict –  $89,299 (cross-claim)

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Frank W. Nemecek
(Nemecek & Cole)

Manee Pazargad

Jonathan B. Cole
(Nemecek & Cole)


Defendant

Jeffrey B. Singer

Jennifer L. Barry
(Latham & Watkins LLP)

Perry J. Viscounty

Irene Y. Lee

Steven M. Goldberg
(Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP)

Robert F. Gookin


Facts

Plaintiff Barmas, Inc. which was owned by Michael Baruch and Raul DeArmas, managed a salon, spa, and wellness center. Barmas, Inc. licensed intellectual property and rented commercial space from defendants Fred Segal, Michael Segal, and their affiliated business entities, in the Fred Segal Center in Santa Monica, California. Barmas, Inc. sued the Segals for intentional and negligent misrepresentation, breach of oral contract, breach of written contract, and promissory estoppel. The Segals cross-claimed for, among other things, breach of the lease agreement, conversion, trademark infringement.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff claimed that defendants misrepresented the fact that they would not license plaintiff to utilize the Fred Segal name for a salon at a different location. Further, plaintiff contended that defendants breached oral and written agreements by failing to keep their promises. Plaintiff also denied defendants' claims.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants rejected plaintiff's claims of misconduct and averred that plaintiff illegally took defendants' property from the Fred Segal Center and sold or disposed of it. Further, defendants argued that plaintiff committed fraud, unlawfully interfered with its contracts, committed trademark infringement, engaged in unfair competition and false advertising, and illegally utilized the Fred Segal name to look for business.

Result

The jury awarded defendants $89,299 on their cross-claim. Additionally, the Court granted a permanent injunction against Barmas Inc., with respect to their use of the Fred Segal name and trademark, and awarded the Segals their costs and attorneys fees.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Aug. 14, 2008.


#119247

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390