This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Premises Liability
Negligence/Negligent Supervision/Sexual Molestation

John Doe, a minor v. John Roe, a minor, Jose R. Lemus, Isabella Lemus

Published: Jan. 12, 2008 | Result Date: Nov. 29, 2007 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: S-1500-CV-000000 Verdict –  $1,000,000

Court

Kern Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Armond Marcarian


Defendant

Brian H. O'Driscoll
(Law Office of Penny S. Moore)


Experts

Plaintiff

William Vicary
(medical)

Facts

The plaintiff is an autistic minor who when 11 years old was sexually molested on several occasions by the minor defendant who at the time was 14 years old. The acts of sexual molestations occurred at the minor defendant's parent's house including at the minor defendant's parent's walk-in closet.

The plaintiff, a male minor through his guardian ad litem, brought an action against another minor male, and his parents for negligence (against the minor defendant), negligent supervision (against minor defendant's parents), and premises liability.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff contended that the minor defendant's parents knew or should have known about the minor defendant's sexual propensity to molest other minors.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
The defendants contended that the minor defendant's parents did not have any information regarding their minor son's sexual tendencies prior to the incidents involving the minor plaintiff.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff's C.C.P. Section 998 offer in the amount of $100,000 to the minor defendant expired by operation of law. The plaintiff's C.C.P. Section 998 offer in the amount of $199,999 to the minor defendant's parents also expired by operation of law.

Injuries

The plaintiff suffered rectal bleeding, as well as emotional trauma and pain and suffering.

Result

The jury returned a verdict in favor of the minor plaintiff and against the minor defendant in the amount of $1 million.

Other Information

The defendants' motion for nonsuit was granted on the negligent supervision and the premises liability causes of action. The plaintiff's motion for directed verdict was granted on the negligence cause of action against the minor defendant. The case was then submitted to the jury on the issue of damages. FILING DATE: Aug. 1, 2006.

Deliberation

1.5 days

Length

four days


#119572

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390