This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Breach of Warranty
Unfair Business Competition

Michael Freeman v. Gateway Inc.

Published: Feb. 2, 2008 | Result Date: Aug. 1, 2007 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: RIC414886 Verdict –  Defense

Court

Riverside Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michael S. Geller
(Law Office of Michael Geller Inc)

Dan L. Foley

Alishia A. Kravig

Richard A. Stewart


Defendant

Jeffery D. McFarland
(McKool Smith Hennigan)

Michael N. Wagner

Shaka Johnson

Scott R. Commerson
(Davis Wright Tremaine LLP)

Jonathan M. Barkey


Facts

Plaintiff Michael Freeman, a 69-year-old retired attorney, bought a laptop computer from defendant Gateway Inc. He sued defendant, alleging its refusal to provide on-site services constituted a breach of warranty and unfair business practice under the Song-Beverly and Consumer Legal Remedies Acts.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff contended he could not take his computer to a nearby repair shop. The defendant failed to provide on-site services pursuant to its warranty.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendant contended it complied with its on-site warranty contract. The plaintiff refused to help technical support diagnose the problem over the phone and never attempted to take his laptop to available repair shops.

Damages

The plaintiff sought $3,421 for rescission of the contract; $10,158 for violation of the Song-Beverly Act; and unspecified damages for violation of the Consumer Legal Remedies Act.

Result

The jury returned a verdict for the defense. It determined plaintiff did not give defendant a reasonable opportunity to repair the computer. Further, plaintiff did not purchase the laptop for personal, household, or family use, barring recovery under the Song-Beverly Act and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act.

Other Information

FILING DATE: July 8, 2004.


#119633

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390