This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Auto v. Bus
Sideswipe Collision

Richard Porter v. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District, a public entity, John Does 1 to 25 inclusive

Published: Feb. 16, 2008 | Result Date: Dec. 5, 2007 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CGC-05-439395 Verdict –  Defense

Court

San Francisco Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Kenneth L. Valinoti
(Valinoti, Specter & Dito LLP)


Defendant

Dale L. Allen Jr.
(Allen, Glaessner, Hazelwood & Werth LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

Jerome Barakos
(medical)

Phillip H. Allman III, Ph.D.
(technical)

John J. Lavorgna
(medical)

Defendant

Earl V. Fogelberg
(medical)

William K. Hoddick M.D.
(medical)

Rajeev Kelkar Ph.D.
(technical)

Facts

On June 30, 2004, forty-three year plaintiff Richard Porter, a nightclub bouncer, was sitting in his parked SUV waiting for his friend on the south side of Mission Street between Fremont and Beale Street, in San Francisco. As he was parked there, Porter's vehicle was sideswiped by a Golden Gate Transit bus, scraping the entire driver's side. Porter, scared, tried to move his body over the center console to the passenger side. While attempting this, he landed on the console twisting his spine and hurting his back. He felt immediate pain in his neck and back. The bus did not stop. Porter sued the Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District for negligence.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Porter alleged that the bus was speeding through the intersection in the slow or "curb" lane as the traffic light turned from yellow to red. The plaintiff also argued that if Golden Gate was pushed into Porter by the unknown bus, Golden Gate was still responsible because the driver should have avoided continuing to drive parallel to the other bus creating a hazardous condition.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defense argued that the Golden Gate bus was not the owner of the bus that hit Porter and used the "empty chair" defense. The defense contended that there was another bus that swerved into the Golden Gate bus and hit its side mirror and that caused the Golden Gate bus to swerve and hit Porter. The owner of the other bus is unknown.

Damages

Pain and suffering, past medical treatment and lost wages.

Injuries

Porter sustained a bulge and nerve impingement and a decreased range of motion. He underwent 3 spinal surgeries, 12 epidural injections for pain management, and several moths of physical therapy.

Result

A jury found Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation Authority not liable for Porter's injuries. The jury found that the accident was caused by the unknown bus that caused Golden Gate bus to swerve into Porter's parked vehicle.

Other Information

Insurer for Golden Gate: self insured.

Deliberation

three hours

Poll

12-0

Length

six days


#119654

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390