This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
Race Discrimination
Failure to Accommodate

Dominic Hardie v. The National Collegiate Athletic Association, International Girls Basketball Association, Alliant International University, Town and County Hotel LLC

Published: Apr. 25, 2015 | Result Date: Mar. 24, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:13-cv-00346-GPC-DHB Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Dan E. Chambers

Thomas H. Prouty
(California Department of Education)

Jane Dolkart

Padrig W.E. Browne


Defendant

Tanja L. Darrow
(Littler Mendelson PC)

Heather Shook


Facts

Dominic Hardie sued The National Collegiate Athletic Association, Alliant International University, International Girls Basketball Organization, and Town and County Hotel LLC relating to his denial of employment as a basketball coach.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Dominic Hardie, an African-American male, was a high school women's basketball coach. He was convicted of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, a felony under Texas law. He was certified by the NCAA to coach at NCAA tournaments for the 2010 and 2011 seasons but his application to coach for the 2012 and 2013 seasons was denied. The NCAA initially barred all convicted felons from coaching at its tournaments, modified its policy in 2006 to allow non-violent felons with convictions older than seven years to coach, and then reverted back to its old policy barring all felons in 2011. Plaintiff had been convicted of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, a felony under Texas law.

Plaintiff asserted causes of action for violation of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for intentional and disparate impact discrimination.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
NCAA denied wrongdoing and asserted various affirmative defenses.

Result

The court found that Title II of the Civil Rights Act did not encompass a disparate impact theory of discrimination and granted NCAA's motion for summary judgment.


#119806

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390