This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumers Legal Remedies Act
Lemon Law

Ethan McCarthy v. Mira Auto Sales Inc,. Western Surety Company

Published: Sep. 10, 2016 | Result Date: Apr. 13, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CIVRS1400735 Verdict –  $18,977

Court

San Bernardino Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Robert B. Mobasseri
(Law Offices of Robert B. Mobasseri PC)


Defendant

Mark J. Tundis
(Law Office of Mark J Tundis)


Facts

Ethan McCarthy sued Mira Auto Sales Inc. and Western Surety Co., concerning a vehicle he purchased from defendant.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
On May 4, 2013, plaintiff purchased a used 2008 Dodge Caliber from Mira Auto Sales. The dealership allegedly agreed to include a warranty for no additional charge. Plaintiff later discovered that the document was actually a service contract. Soon after purchase, he began hearing knocking noises and subsequently found out that the entire car's engine block, clutch, turbocharger, and intercooler needed to be replaced due to pre-existing damage. Plaintiff attempted to return the car to the dealership via the warranty, but the dealer refused to fix his car. Plaintiff sued the dealership and the bond company, alleging that the car's condition constituted a violation of the state's "lemon law."

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff allegedly purchased the used vehicle "as-is" and, as such, defendants were not responsible for the repairs.

Damages

McCarthy sought a rescission of the contract, amounting to around $15,000 to $20,000.

Result

The jury found that an implied warranty existed and that defendants violated the state consumer laws by intentionally misrepresenting the condition of the vehicle. It then awarded McCarthy $18,977 in damages.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Feb. 7, 2014.


#120132

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390