Doe Tenants v. Roe Hotel Owners and Operators
Published: Nov. 1, 2008 | Result Date: Jul. 31, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Settlement – $750,000
Court
San Francisco Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Defendant
Kurt D. Bridgman
(Vogl Meredith Burke, LLP )
Facts
The plaintiffs represented a class of 225 tenants who had resided in the San Francisco residential hotel owned by defendants between Feb. 28, 2003 and July 31, 2008. The plaintiffs filed suit for breach of the covenant of habitability.
Contentions
PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiffs contended that the hotel was inhabitable due to an inoperable elevator, defective roof, electrical deficiencies, infestation of rodents and roaches, to name a few of the unsanitary conditions.
DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
The defendants denied all claims.
Damages
The plaintiffs sought damages for rent abatement, discomfort, annoyance, statutory damages, and attorney fees and costs.
Result
The plaintiffs settled the suit for $750,000, which was prior to the determination of a motion to certify the class. The plaintiffs will divide the award based on the number of days each plaintiff was a resident of the hotel during the named period.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390