This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Medical Malpractice
Negligent Resection of Spinal Lesion

Jane Doe v. Roe Neurosurgeon, Roe Hospital

Published: Dec. 15, 2012 | Result Date: Jun. 13, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Settlement –  $180,000

Court

Orange Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Daniel M. Hodes
(Hodes Milman LLP)


Defendant

James J. Kjar
(Kjar, McKenna & Stockalper LLP)

David A. Winkle
(Murchison & Cumming LLP)


Facts

In December 2008, plaintiff Jane Doe, 55, developed lower back pain. Imaging studies showed a lesion at L5-S1 that appeared to be benign.

On March 13, 2009, Roe neurosurgeon attempted to perform a gross total resection of the lesion. This resulted in a foot drop.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff argued that the appearance of the lesion on pre-operative imaging was such that one could not rule out a malignancy. She argued that the standard of care, therefore, required the performance of a frozen section biopsy at the outset of the surgery. The lesion was found to be a B-cell lymphoma. Had this been known, surgery would have been aborted and plaintiff would have been treated with a combination of chemotherapy and radiation.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defense argued that plaintiff's actions represented a reasonable exercise of neurosurgical judgment.

Result

The case settled for $180,000 at mediation with Joseph Thielen, Esq.


#121706

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390