Jane Doe v. Roe Neurosurgeon, Roe Hospital
Published: Dec. 15, 2012 | Result Date: Jun. 13, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Settlement – $180,000
Court
Orange Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Daniel M. Hodes
(Hodes Milman LLP)
Defendant
James J. Kjar
(Kjar, McKenna & Stockalper LLP)
David A. Winkle
(Murchison & Cumming LLP)
Facts
In December 2008, plaintiff Jane Doe, 55, developed lower back pain. Imaging studies showed a lesion at L5-S1 that appeared to be benign.
On March 13, 2009, Roe neurosurgeon attempted to perform a gross total resection of the lesion. This resulted in a foot drop.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff argued that the appearance of the lesion on pre-operative imaging was such that one could not rule out a malignancy. She argued that the standard of care, therefore, required the performance of a frozen section biopsy at the outset of the surgery. The lesion was found to be a B-cell lymphoma. Had this been known, surgery would have been aborted and plaintiff would have been treated with a combination of chemotherapy and radiation.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defense argued that plaintiff's actions represented a reasonable exercise of neurosurgical judgment.
Result
The case settled for $180,000 at mediation with Joseph Thielen, Esq.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390