This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Construction
Construction Defects
Negligent Excavation

Ihor A. Lys v. Lee M. Chao

Published: Dec. 22, 2012 | Result Date: Oct. 17, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 37-2011-00094621-CU-OR-CTL Settlement –  $1,400,000

Court

San Diego Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Scott B. Hilberg
(Thomas Lucas)

John E. Thickstun


Defendant

Christopher R. Allison

Robert M. Juskie
(Wingert, Grebing, Brubaker & Juskie LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

Glenn D. Tofani
(technical)

Defendant

Kevin Jordan
(technical)

Facts

In May 2009, defendant Lee M. Chao purchased an undeveloped lot on Mount Soledad in La Jolla and began excavating the property for future development of a single-family residence in June 2009. During the course of the excavation, two upslope homeowners complained about cracking of site improvements on their property. An initial investigation by Chao's civil engineer suggested wet fill soils on the upslope properties as the cause.

Plaintiff Ihor A. Lys purchased the property directly upslope of Chao's property in January 2010. Over time, he noticed increased movement of his rear yard resulting in, among other things, cracking of patio, exterior site walls, and interior and exterior house walls. Inclinometers installed in his rear yard confirmed that the slope was shifting west toward the Chao property at approximately 42 feet below ground.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that Chao, by excavating his property without providing adequate temporary or permanent shoring, destabilized the slope.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant contended that the damage to plaintiff's site improvements resulted from wet fill soils on Plaintiff's property rather than the Chao excavation. Defendant also contended that Plaintiff purchased the property at a discount with knowledge of the soils conditions.

Result

The case settled two weeks before trial. Defendant agreed to pay Plaintiff policy limits of $1.4 million, to transfer his property (in which he invested approximately $1 million) to Plaintiff free and clear, and to assign his rights to Plaintiff to pursue litigation against third parties.

Other Information

FILING DATE: July 18, 2011.


#121747

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390