This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property
Property Damage
Water Damage

Robert McLaughlin, Peggy McLaughlin v. Carl Day, Carol Day

Published: Aug. 25, 2007 | Result Date: Feb. 26, 2007 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: LC065914 Verdict –  $469,935

Court

L.A. Superior Van Nuys


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Stephen A. DiGiuseppe


Defendant

Stefan O'Grady

Robert W. Nelms


Experts

Plaintiff

Scott Moors
(technical)

Frank Ultimo
(technical)

Osman Pekin
(technical)

Defendant

Frank Hagar
(technical)

David H. Lee
(technical)

Tim Nalley
(technical)

Steven Provenghi
(technical)

Facts

Plaintiff Robert McLaughlin resided in a Malibu Lake home with his wife Peggy for over 20 years. Plaintiffs' home was below defendants Carl and Carol Day's home. In 1999, defendants purchased additional acres of vacant land above plaintiffs' home. Defendants began converting the land into an orchard, where they planted several trees, graded the land, and constructed roads and an irrigation system.

The plaintiffs claimed that in December 2002, they started noticing water damage to their property. They eventually discovered that their retaining wall was damaged and their foundation was sinking. The plaintiffs sued for property damage.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiffs contended that the water damage was caused by the changes defendants made to the land above plaintiffs' property and the irrigation system.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
The defendants contended that the plaintiffs' house was 50 years old and located on poorly compacted fill. Moreover, plaintiffs' water damage was a pre-existing problem.

Damages

The plaintiffs sought $75,000 to cover repair costs. Additional repairs were estimated at approximately $360,000.

Result

The jury found for plaintiffs and awarded them $469,935.

Deliberation

1.5 days

Poll

12-0 on most causes of action

Length

three weeks


#122270

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390