This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Injunctive and Declaratory Relief

Kathleen Levasseur v. Los Angeles County Fire Fighters Local 1014 Health and Welfare Plan and Does 1 through 50, inclusive

Published: Oct. 4, 2014 | Result Date: Jul. 2, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:13-cv-05245-RGK-RZ Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Gary L. Tysch
(Law Offices of Gary L. Tysch)


Defendant

Elise D. Klein
(Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP)


Facts

Kathleen Levasseur suffered from complex regional pain syndrome, also known as reflex sympathetic dystrophy, after undergoing spine surgery. In 2011, she asked Dr. Edward Carden for treatment of the condition. Dr. Carden treated the pain associated with the disease by giving her ketamine infusions. Later, Levasseur sought coverage from the Los Angeles Country Fire Fighters Local 1014 Health and Welfare Plan in order cover the costs of the infusions, but the claim was denied on the basis that the infusions were an experimental drug. Levasseur appealed, arguing that the Food & Drug Administration had approved the infusions. However, the claim was denied once again. Consequently, Levasseur filed suit against the Plan.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff sought to require defendant to cover the costs of her ketamine infusions, arguing that the infusions were approved by the FDA and were very common in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome. She alleged claims under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act, and for breach of plan and plan benefits, and sought injunctive relief and declaratory relief.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant argued that its denial of coverage was warranted because the FDA had not approved ketamine infusion for pain management based on the medical opinion of a practicing board certified anesthesiologist who was certified in pain management.

Result

The court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant, finding that its denial of the claim was reasonable and supported by qualified medical opinions.


#122472

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390