Thomas W. Cefalu v. Genentech Inc., Genentech USA Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Published: Jan. 5, 2013 | Result Date: Oct. 25, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: CIV491665 Verdict – Defense
Court
San Mateo Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Michael B. Sachs
(Clark Hill LLP)
Defendant
Lynne C. Hermle
(Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP)
Joseph C. Liburt
(Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP)
Experts
Plaintiff
Paul S.D. Berg
(medical)
Jan Duffy
(technical)
Defendant
Rhoma D. Young
(technical)
John Zeitz
(medical)
Facts
Plaintiff Thomas W. Cefalu, a clinical specialist, was terminated from his position with Genentech Inc. Cefalu claimed that he was terminated because the company learned that he'd been in a motor vehicle accident, caused by a seizure disorder. After the accident, Cefalu took a three-month medical leave for injuries arising out of the accident. His license was suspended but later reinstated after he was terminated.
Cefalu sued Genentech for disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable accommodation, failure to engage in the interactive process, failure to prevent discrimination, retaliation for taking permitted leave, and failure to pay incentive bonus. He claimed that after his supervisor found out about the seizure, he received a call from human resources telling him that he would be unable to return to work without neurological clearance. The neurologist informed the company that he was not allowed to resume his duties.
Genentech denied that it discriminated against Cefalu. The company argued that Cefalu was an established poor performer who had committed expense-related misconduct and was terminated only after the company learned that he had returned to work and driven for 300 miles on business on a suspended license.
Result
Punitive damages and the California Family rights act claim were dismissed on non-suit at the close of Plaintiff's case. The wage claim and penalties associated with it were dismissed on a directed verdict at the close of the evidence, and the four remaining claims went to the jury. The jury returned a defense verdict on the remaining claims.
Deliberation
three hours
Poll
12-0
Length
four weeks
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390