This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Disability Discrimination
Retaliation

Thomas W. Cefalu v. Genentech Inc., Genentech USA Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive

Published: Jan. 5, 2013 | Result Date: Oct. 25, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CIV491665 Verdict –  Defense

Court

San Mateo Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michael B. Sachs
(Clark Hill LLP)

David J. Becht


Defendant

Lynne C. Hermle
(Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP)

Joseph C. Liburt
(Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

Paul S.D. Berg
(medical)

Jan Duffy
(technical)

Defendant

Rhoma D. Young
(technical)

John Zeitz
(medical)

Facts

Plaintiff Thomas W. Cefalu, a clinical specialist, was terminated from his position with Genentech Inc. Cefalu claimed that he was terminated because the company learned that he'd been in a motor vehicle accident, caused by a seizure disorder. After the accident, Cefalu took a three-month medical leave for injuries arising out of the accident. His license was suspended but later reinstated after he was terminated.

Cefalu sued Genentech for disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable accommodation, failure to engage in the interactive process, failure to prevent discrimination, retaliation for taking permitted leave, and failure to pay incentive bonus. He claimed that after his supervisor found out about the seizure, he received a call from human resources telling him that he would be unable to return to work without neurological clearance. The neurologist informed the company that he was not allowed to resume his duties.

Genentech denied that it discriminated against Cefalu. The company argued that Cefalu was an established poor performer who had committed expense-related misconduct and was terminated only after the company learned that he had returned to work and driven for 300 miles on business on a suspended license.

Result

Punitive damages and the California Family rights act claim were dismissed on non-suit at the close of Plaintiff's case. The wage claim and penalties associated with it were dismissed on a directed verdict at the close of the evidence, and the four remaining claims went to the jury. The jury returned a defense verdict on the remaining claims.

Deliberation

three hours

Poll

12-0

Length

four weeks


#122579

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390