This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Auto v. Motorcycle

Sean Choy v. Masaru Hatsushi, M. Hatsushi Landscaping, Mori Hatsushi & Associates, Hatsushi Leasing Company Inc., Hatsushi Leasing Inc., Mori Hatsushi, Tomiko Hatsushi, Masaru Hatsushi (deceased)

Published: Jan. 5, 2013 | Result Date: Dec. 10, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CIVMSC 07-02532 Verdict –  $11,900,700

Court

Contra Costa Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Steven C. Kirby
(Kirbys Law)

Aimee E. Kirby
(Dolan Law Firm PC)


Defendant

Frank D. Presto III

Ralph D. Hughes

John B. Stuckey

Steven S. Miyake


Experts

Plaintiff

Jerome A. Barakos M.D.
(medical)

Ralph J. Kiernan
(medical)

Laurence H. Neuman
(technical)

Patrick F. Mason Ph.D.
(technical)

Joseph E. Long
(medical)

Defendant

Michael C. Olivera
(technical)

Facts

M. Hatsushi Landscaping's landscape vehicle pulled out from a stop sign in front of plaintiff Sean Choy, who was driving his motorcycle. Witnesses said Plaintiff had no chance to avoid the truck. The same witnesses had to brake to avoid the landscape vehicle being driven by Masaru Hatsushi. The truck was carrying equipment to a landscape jobsite, as directed by Corporate officer Mori Hatsushi, at the time. Four months prior to the accident, the corporate secretary, Tomiko Hatsushi, gave the truck to Masaru and kept Masaru working despite being told that he had a bad Department of Motor Vehicle records and was excluded from commercial policies.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs claimed negligence by the landscape company and officers for retaining a bad driver and ratifying his acts after accident when Masaru delivered equipment to Kaiser and was not fired.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants claimed Masaru was retired, no longer employed by the company, and was just returning tools.

Specials in Evidence

$450,672 $1 million

Result

Plaintiffs' verdict for $11,900,672.

Other Information

Appeal probable on Judges ruling eliminating personal liability of officers for negligent retention of employee and ratification. The alter ego trial is pending. FILING DATE: Nov. 28, 2007.

Deliberation

six days

Poll

12-0 (on employment), 11-1 (damages)

Length

15 days


#122590

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390