This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
ADA
Closed-Captioned DVDs

Francis Jancik v. Redbox Automated Retail LLC, Verizon and Redbox Digital Entertainment Services LLC

Published: Jun. 7, 2014 | Result Date: May 14, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 8:13-cv-01387-DOC-RNB Bench Decision –  Dismissal in part

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Stanley D. Saltzman
(Marlin & Saltzman LLP)

Christina A. Humphrey
(Christina Humphrey Law, PC)

Leslie H. Joyner
(Schneider, Wallace, Cottrell & Konecky LLP)


Defendant

Timothy L. Alger

Amanda J. Beane

Julie E. Schwartz
(Perkins Coie LLP)

David F. McDowell Jr.
(Morrison & Foerster LLP)

Dale K. Larson
(Strumwasser & Woocher LLP)


Facts

Francis Jancik sued Redbox Automated Retail LLC, which owns and operates rental kiosks and retail chains, and Redbox Digital Entertainment Services, LLC, which owns and operates an online streaming video rental service.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Jancik, a deaf individual who rented videos from Redbox's Automated kiosks, alleged that Redbox Automated and Redbox Digital violated disability laws by failing to provide closed captioning on its DVDs and streaming videos. Jancik also alleged that both defendants falsely labeled closed-captioned DVDs and streaming videos.

Jancik asserted causes of action for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, California's Unruh Act, California's Disabled Persons Act, California's Consumer Legal Remedies Act, California's False Advertising Law, and California's Unfair Competition Law.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Redbox moved to dismiss Jancik's claims, arguing that he had failed to set forth facts which would entitle him to relief.

Result

The court partially granted Redbox Automated's Motion to Dismiss, dismissing two theories alleged under the ADA, Unruh and DPA claims. The court also dismissed all of Jancik's claims against Redbox Digital, concluding that the Internet is not a place of public accommodation.


#122632

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390