This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumer Protection
Consumer Legal Remedies Act

Yaniv Dvora, on Behalf of Himself, All Others Similarly Situated and the General Public v. General Mills Inc.

Published: Jan. 14, 2012 | Result Date: Oct. 17, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:11-cv-01074-GW (PLAx) Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Craig M. Nicholas
(Entorno Law LLP)

Alex M. Tomasevic
(Nicholas & Tomasevic LLP)


Defendant

Brian C. Anderson

Carlos M. Lazatin

Sabrina H. Strong
(O'Melveny & Myers LLP)


Facts

A putative class action was filed against General Mills Inc. for misleading the public by falsely claiming that its Total Blueberry Pomegranate cereal product contained real fruit.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs alleged that the large and bold font printed on the cereal box and fruit images on the box misled the public into believing the product had real fruit, when in fact it did not.

Result

The court ruled that federal product-labeling laws and flavoring regulations preempted plaintiffs' claims. The regulations allowed manufacturers to use a fruit's name and image to describe a flavor even if the product contained no fruit.


#123356

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390