This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property

Scottdale Ins. Comp v. City of Huntington Beach

Published: Jul. 30, 2002 | Result Date: May 23, 2002 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 761735 –  $522,661

Court

Orange Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jeffrey C. Sparks


Defendant

Harold W. Potter Jr.
(Jones & Mayer)

Kimberly Hall Barlow
(Jones & Mayer)

Neal Moore

Tom Mullings

Thomas P. Duarte


Experts

Plaintiff

David Bowles
(technical)

John A. Dracup
(technical)

David H. Williams
(David H. Williams Attorney at Law) (technical)

Rodney L. DuBois
(technical)

Defendant

Theodore V. Hromadka II
(technical)

Facts

The Huntington Apartments were flooded by surface runoff on Jan. 4, 1995, during a major rainstorm. All 136
first-floor apartments were flooded with one to three inches of water.
The flood lasted about five hours, from 5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. All the tenants were evacuated and it took
approximately seven months to repair the apartments and obtain certificates of occupancy. Scottsdale Insurance
Co., the plaintiff, sought in subrogation $2.234 million.
Huntington Beach Associates claimed $800,000 in uninsured losses and lost rents plus
$1.1 million for below market sale of property in December 1997.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiffs demanded $5.4 million to settle the whole case. At the voluntary settlement conference, the plaintiff wanted $400,000 from the city of Huntington Beach. Prior to trial the city offered $100,000.

Other Information

The plaintiff settled with all defendants except for the city of Huntington Beach before trial. The plaintiff is contemplating an appeal based on the contention that there was no legal basis for the court to apportion damages as the property was not historically subject to flooding. The city of Huntington Beach is contemplating an appeal because their belief is that there is no causation between the surface runoff that entered the apartments off the street came from other public entities and that they are not responsible for the 405 Freeway's blockage of the natural drainage.

Length

30 days


#123959

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390