This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Fraud
Fraudulent Transfer
Constructive Trust

William J. Hoffman, Court-appointed permanent receiver for Nationwide Automated Systems, Inc., Oasis Studio Rentals, LLC, Oasis Studio Rentals #2, LLC, and Oasis Studio Rentals #3, LLC, and their subsidiaries and affiliates v. Marvin Tarnol, individually and as Trustee of the Marvin Tarnol and Laurie Tarnol Second Amended Intervivos Trust Dated Nov

Published: Oct. 15, 2016 | Result Date: Sep. 26, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:15-cv-05755-SJO-FFM Summary Judgment –  Plaintiff

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Ted G. Fates
(Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP)

David R. Zaro
(Allen, Matkins, Leck, Gamble, Mallory & Natsis LLP)

Tim C. Hsu
(Allen, Matkins, Leck, Gamble, Mallory & Natsis LLP)


Defendant

Ralph C. Loeb

Marc Smith


Facts

William Hoffman, the court-appointed permanent receiver for Nationwide Automated Systems Inc., Oasis Studio Rentals LLC, Oasis Studio Rentals No.2 LLC, and Oasis Studio Rentals No.3 LLC, and its subsidiaries and affiliates, filed a complaint against Marvin Tarnol and Laurie Tarnol, individually and as Trustees of the Marvin Tarnol and Laurie Tarnol Second Amended Intervivos Trust Dated Nov. 4, 1997, involving allegations of fraud.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
NASI was allegedly a classic Ponzi scheme. In 2014, the SEC initiated investigations, leading to the appointment of a receivership. Following an investigation, plaintiff uncovered several fraudulent transfers to defendants from the receivership entities. Plaintiff brought this action against defendants, alleging causes of action for fraudulent transfer, unjust enrichment, and constructive trust. Plaintiff additionally moved for summary judgment.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants denied the allegations and asserted various affirmative defenses.

Defendants were not involved in the formation, conduct or perpetration of the fraudulent scheme. Defendants contended they were innocent investors, who had no involvement in the scheme for which the Receiver was appointed. The complaint was for funds paid to defendants as investors only and who, themselves, were victims of the scheme.

Result

The district court entered judgment in favor of the receiver, Hoffman, and entered judgment against the Tarnols in the amount of $1,456,716.


#124122

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390