This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
National Origin Discrimination
Wrongful Termination

John F. Elizondo v. United States Department of the Navy, a government entity, and Does 1 through 100, inclusive

Published: Apr. 24, 2010 | Result Date: Feb. 8, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:02-cv-01063-MMA-BLM Verdict –  Defense

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Frank Hakim

Roxanne A. Davis


Defendant

Timothy C. Stutler

Beth A. Clukey
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)


Facts

Plaintiff John Elizondo was an employee of defendant United States Department of the Navy, U.S. Marine Corps. for over 25 years, 20 of which as an active duty Marine. From 1995 until 2000, Elizondo worked as a Range Control Officer at Camp Pendleton, reporting to Airspace Manager/Deputy Doe. Elizondo was terminated in December 2000. Elizondo filed suit against the Navy alleging national origin discrimination, national origin harassment, retaliation in violation of Title VII, and retaliation in violation of whistleblower statutes. The judge dismissed all claims prior to trial except national origin discrimination.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Elizondo contended that Deputy Doe made derogatory and racist comments to him and other Latino employees. He further claimed that nothing was done when he reported Deputy Doe's discrimination, harassment, and safety issues to superiors. Elizondo alleged that he was discriminated against and harassed by Deputy Doe, who scrutinized his work, took away responsibilities, disciplined him, and fired him unjustly.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Secretary Marbus contended Elizondo was removed after failing to follow direct orders on numerous occasions and after numerous meetings during which he was counseled against such behavior. Marbus further contended that Deputy Doe never made derogatory or racist comments to Elizondo or to any other Latino employee. Marbus also contended Elizondo never complained about any alleged discrimination, harassment or safety issues.

Injuries

Elizondo sought damages for loss of earnings, general damages, special damages, reinstatement, and attorney fees.

Result

The jury rendered a verdict for the defense.

Other Information

The trial judge was a former Marine.

Deliberation

1.5 hours

Poll

8-0

Length

seven days


#124164

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390