Thomas Lutge v. Michael Miller, Esq., Brodsky, Baskin & Miller
Published: Apr. 24, 2010 | Result Date: Apr. 2, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: CGC-05-440436 Verdict – $275,000 (gross)
Court
San Francisco Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Defendant
Basil N. Plastiras Jr.
(Plastiras & Terrizzi)
Experts
Plaintiff
Michael A. Matthews
(technical)
J. Michael Mathews
(technical)
Facts
The underlying case was a construction dispute between homeowners and Thomas Lutge, a civil engineer and construction contractor. Lutge, through his attorney, Michael Miller, sued the homeowners for unpaid work. The homeowners cross-claimed for fraud, negligence, breach of contract, and statutory violations. Within days of trial, the case settled with Lutge paying the homeowners $245,000 out of his pocket.
Lutge filed suit against Miller for malpractice. Miller filed a cross-claim for unpaid legal fees.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Lutge contended that Miller failed to tender the homeowners' cross-claim to Lutge's insurance carrier, mistakenly thinking that there was no coverage available. Lutge contended that he was therefore denied a paid defense. Further, Lutge contended that Miller failed to investigate the facts and marshal the evidence, so that Miller was completely unprepared when, mere days before trial, certain deposition testimony failed to support some of his client's claims.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defense claimed that Lutge pulled a "bait and switch" upon the homeowners, luring them into a contract Lutge did not intend to perform. Miller contended that Lutge then misrepresented the facts to him. Miller did not perform an independent investigation of the evidence because he relied completely upon his client's version of the facts. Further, Miller contended that there would have been no coverage or defense available to Lutge from his insurance.
Damages
Lutge sought to recover $245,000 paid to the homeowners in the underlying settlement and $30,000 in paid but allegedly unearned legal fees. Miller claimed $38,000 in unpaid legal fees.
Result
The jury found Miller liable for legal negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and negligent misrepresentation/failure to disclose and awarded Lutge $275,000. Although found to have had clean hands, Lutge was determined to be 25 percent comparatively negligent. Lutge's net recover, after allocation, was $206,250. The jury found in favor of Lutge on Brodsky, Baskin & Miller's cross-claim.
Other Information
FILING DATE: April 14, 2005.
Deliberation
6.5 hours
Poll
9-3
Length
10 days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390