Waterford Nut Company Inc. v. Bitta Toor, Toor Farming
Published: Apr. 24, 2010 | Result Date: Apr. 6, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 378531 Verdict – $150,000
Court
Stanislaus Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Defendant
William L. Cowin
(Law Office of William L. Cowin Inc. APC)
Experts
Plaintiff
John Eisenhut
(technical)
Defendant
Surgit S. Tut
(technical)
Facts
In 2004, the parties entered into a written contract for defendants to deliver a quantity of almonds to plaintiff for a fixed price per pound. The majority of the almonds contracted for in 2004 were delivered and plaintiff paid defendant for the almonds per the contract.
In February 2005, the parties entered into another written contract for defendants to deliver 150,000 pounds of almonds for a fixed price.
In July 2005, the market price of almonds had risen dramatically to over $1 per pound more than the contract price. Defendants refused to deliver any almonds to plaintiff.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that it had a contract obligating defendant to deliver almonds, that the "oral agreement" claimed by defendants was barred by the parole evidence rule, and that plaintiff was entitled to damages pursuant to Commercial Code sec. 2713.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants claimed that they had an oral agreement with plaintiff's agent (who died in May 2005), that if they sold a particular ranch, they would not have to deliver almonds pursuant to the written contract.
Settlement Discussions
Plaintiff made a C.C.P. section 998 demand of $113,000. Defendants offered $30,000 on the first day of trial.
Result
Verdict for $150,000.
Other Information
FILING DATE: March 5, 2006.
Deliberation
2.5 hours
Poll
12-0
Length
nine days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390