This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Product Liability
Asbestos Exposure

Melvin Desin v. Asbestos Corporation Limited, et al.

Published: Jan. 19, 2013 | Result Date: Nov. 2, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CGC-11-275881 Verdict –  $13,227,900

Court

San Francisco Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Gilbert L. Purcell
(Brayton & Purcell)

Christopher Hersom


Defendant

Jennifer Judin

William N. Foxley

Catherine M. Krow

Julie A. Torres


Experts

Plaintiff

Barry R. Horn M.D.
(medical)

David M. Jablons
(medical)

Richard J. Cohen
(medical)

Arnold R. Brody Ph.D.
(technical)

William M. Ewing
(technical)

James Mills M.A.
(technical)

Allan H. Smith
(medical)

Samuel P. Hammar
(medical)

Defendant

William Dyson
(technical)

Edward Van der Bogert
(technical)

David Weill M.D.
(medical)

Facts

In 2011, Melvin Desin was diagnosed with mesothelioma from asbestos exposure.

Desin previously served in the U.S. Coast Guard and worked as an electrician at several residential and commercial sites in San Francisco since 1953. In 1997, he retired from the electrician trade before being diagnosed with the cancer.

Desin sued several manufacturers and over 40 other industrial and commercial entities. He reached confidential settlements with most of the defendants excluding Kaiser Gypsum Co. Inc., a manufacturer of asbestos-containing joint compounds, Union Carbide Corp., a supplier of asbestos fiber to joint compound manufacturers and several other defendants and thus proceeded to trial against Kaiser Gypsum.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that Defendants defectively designed its asbestos-containing products. Plaintiff also contended that Defendants failed to warn of the defects in its products.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Kaiser Gypsum contended that the exposure to asbestos-containing joint compounds was not large enough in dose to cause Plaintiff's mesothelioma. It further contended that exposure to the type of asbestos used in its joint compounds, chrysotile asbestos, did not cause mesothelioma.

Damages

Desin sought recovery of $260,939 in damages for medical costs, and an unspecified amount for pain and suffering. Desin also sought punitive damages.

Injuries

Desin was diagnosed with mesothelioma and has had to deal with severe respiratory illness. At the time of trial, his life expectancy was claimed to be less than one year.

Result

Following Desin's case-in-chief, Union Carbide settled with Desin. The matter continued against Kaiser Gypsum only. The jury ultimately found in Desin's favor and determined that Kaiser Gypsum was 5 percent liable for Desin's injuries and that the U.S. Coast Guard was 43 percent liable, with the rest divided among other defendants. Desin was subsequently awarded more than $7.2 million in damages. The jury also found that Kaiser Gypsum acted with oppression and/or malice and awarded Desin $6 million in punitive damages.

Deliberation

three days

Length

10 weeks


#124339

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390