This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
RICO
18. U.S.C. Section 1962(c) and (d)

Kathy Shaw and Hartwell Steele, individually, and on behalf of other members of the public similarly situated v. Nissan North America Inc.

Published: Dec. 31, 2016 | Result Date: Oct. 31, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:16-cv-04372-DDP-RAO Bench Decision –  Defense

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jordan L. Lurie
(Pomerantz LLP)

Roland K. Tellis
(Baron & Budd PC)

Payam Shahian
(Strategic Legal Practices APC)

Cody R. Padgett
(Capstone Law APC)

Dara Tabesh
(EcoTech Law Group, PC)

Mark P. Pifko
(Baron & Budd PC)


Defendant

Dennis M. Murphy

Paul J. Riehle
(Faegre, Drinker, Biddle & Reath LLP)


Facts

Plaintiffs brought a putative nationwide class action against Nissan North America Inc. and Nissan Jidosha Kabushiki d/b/a Nissan Motor Co. Ltd.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs contended that Nissan North America and Nissan Motor Co. operated a RICO enterprise with their supplier BorgWarner Inc. Plaintiffs claimed that the members of the alleged enterprise agreed to conceal defects in various Nissan automobiles relating to the timing chain tensioning system.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Nissan contended in its motion to dismiss that plaintiffs' complaint did not meet the requirements for pleading a violation of RICO.

Result

The court granted Nissan North America's motion to dismiss without leave to amend and entered judgment in Nissan North America's favor.

Other Information

The court ruled that the allegations failed to demonstrate a common purpose, much less a fraudulent one. The allegations only demonstrated that the parties were associated in a manner directly related to its own primary business activities. The case was dismissed and file closed without an appearance by Nissan Motor Co. Ltd.


#124630

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390