This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Conversion
Breach of Trust and Tortious Interference with Corporate Business

Anglican Church in America; The Diocese of the West; The Recor, Wardens, and Vestrymen of St. Mary of the Angel's Parish in Hollywood, Los Angeles, California v. Christopher P. Kelley, and Does 1 through 25, inclusive

Published: Jan. 7, 2017 | Result Date: Dec. 12, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC485402 Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Damon C. Anastasia
(Lancaster & Anastasia LLP)

William H. Lancaster
(Lancaster & Anastasia LLP)


Defendant

Kathryn L. Greer
(Greer & Rineer)

Pal A. Lengyel-Leahu
(Law Offices of Pal A. Lengyal-Leahu)

Allegra P. Rineer
(Greer & Rineer)


Facts

The Anglican Church in America, the Diocese of the West, and the Rector, Wardens, and Vestrymen of St. Mary of the Angels Parish in Hollywood brought an action against Father Christopher Kelley, the church's priest.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs contended that defendant had been removed as Rector of the church for various wrongdoings but that he unlawfully entered the church and refused to leave. As such, they sought for him to be ejected. They also claimed he committed conversion and violated various laws by diverting church funds.

Plaintiffs asserted causes of action in their second amended complaint for ejectment, conversion, breach of trust and tortious interference with corporate business, preliminary and permanent injunction, unfair and deceptive business practices, and accounting and disgorgement of benefits.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant contended that plaintiffs' lacked standing because they had no ownership interest in the church property and only the church's board of directors had standing to bring litigation on behalf of the church. Defendant further argued that none of the members of the board of directors had authorized the present litigation and plaintiffs' were collaterally estopped from re-litigating the membership of the board.

Result

The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment.


#124675

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390