This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Breach of Contract
Wrongful Termination

Jimmy Kuang v. Bel Air Mart, and Does 1 to 50, inclusive

Published: Oct. 1, 2016 | Result Date: Sep. 7, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:15-cv-00160-JAM-EFB Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

USDC Eastern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Mona Tashroudian
(Tashroudian Law Group APC)

David A. Tashroudian
(Tashroudian Law Group APC)


Defendant

Colleen R. Howard
(Porter Scott APC)

Lindsay A. Goulding
(Porter Scott APC)

Derek J. Haynes
(Porter Scott APC)


Facts

Jimmy Kuang sued his former employer, Bel Air Mart, in connection with his allegedly wrongful termination.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff was a cook at the Hot Wok Dept. and a member of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union. Plaintiff claimed that defendant could only fire employees for "just cause" pursuant to defendant and the Union's collective bargaining agreement. However, defendant allegedly terminated without just cause. Plaintiff brought this action against defendant, alleging wrongful termination, breach of contract, and breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff was allegedly caught on surveillance taking cough drops and other merchandise to the back room before paying for them. Such conduct violated the company's policies, which prohibited employees from consuming merchandise in the store before paying for it. Employees were also prohibited from selecting merchandise and setting it aside to pay for it later. Therefore, defendant argued it had "just cause" for terminating plaintiff's employment. Accordingly, defendant moved for summary judgment.

Result

The court granted summary judgment in favor of the employer.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Jan. 20, 2015.


#124980

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390