Arthur Campbell v. Medtronic Minimed Inc., and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Published: Oct. 1, 2016 | Result Date: Sep. 6, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 2:15-cv-08091-RGK-PJW Summary Judgment – Defense
Court
USDC Central
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Thomas V. Girardi
(Girardi & Keese)
Defendant
Tanja L. Darrow
(Littler Mendelson PC)
Fatemeh Mashouf
(Littler Mendelson PC)
Facts
Arthur Campbell sued Medtronic Minimed Inc., involving allegations of wrongful termination.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff began working for defendant in February 1999 until he was illegally terminated in May 2014. Plaintiff's job included assisting defendant in ensuring compliance with state and federal law. Plaintiff claimed he reported several violations of those laws to his supervisors' attention. Plaintiff believed that the quality of defendant's products were being compromised, which, in turn, affected the health and safety of the patients who used defendant's products. Plaintiff's complaints, however, remained ignored until he was finally fired in May 2014. Plaintiff sued, asserting causes of action for retaliation, age discrimination, disability discrimination, unfair business practices, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent infliction of emotional distress.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant moved for summary judgment.
Result
The court granted summary judgment in favor of Medtronic.
Other Information
FILING DATE: Sept. 11, 2015.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390