This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
National Origin Discrimination
Wrongful Termination

Teresita L. Viana v. FedEx Corporate Services Inc. dba FedEx Services, and Does 1 through 20

Published: Sep. 24, 2016 | Result Date: Sep. 6, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:15-cv-08316-JFW-AS Bench Decision –  Defense

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Chad T. Wishchuk
(Finch Thornton & Baird LLP)

Kathleen A. Donahue


Defendant

Emily C. Pera


Facts

Plaintiff sued FedEx following her termination after 15 years of employment.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff, 55, contended that throughout her employment, she always received positive performance evaluations and annual salary increases, as well as several sales awards. She claimed that after she refused an early retirement buyout package, her supervisor began micromanaging and harassing her, including by making fun of her Colombian accent. Without warning, defendant terminated plaintiff allegedly for falsification of sales logs, however, this reason was pretextual. Rather, plaintiff was terminated because of her age, ancestry, sex, and national origin.

Plaintiff asserted causes of action for age discrimination in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act, national origin/ancestry discrimination in violation of FEHA, sex and/or gender discrimination in violation of FEHA, failure to prevent discrimination in violation of FEHA, wrongful termination in violation of public policy, failure to provide personnel file under Labor Code Section 1198.5, failure to provide payroll records under Labor Code Section 226, failure to provide adequate itemized wage statements under Labor Code Section 226, failure to pay all wages due, and failure to timely pay all wages due.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant denied that plaintiff was terminated because of her sex or gender. Rather, plaintiff was terminated because she falsified company records.

Result

The court granted summary judgment to defendant on plaintiff's first through fifth and ninth through tenth causes of action. The parties stipulated to dismissal of plaintiff's remaining claims, and judgment was entered in defendant's favor on all claims.

Other Information

The case has been appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. FILING DATE: Oct. 23, 2015.


#124989

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390