This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.


Civil Rights
42 U.S.C. Section 1983
Battery

Danielle H. Woodard v. Michael Tippett, State of California, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive

Published: Oct. 1, 2016 | Result Date: Sep. 9, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:15-cv-07452-RGK-KS Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Kirt J. Hopson
(Law Office of Kirt J. Hopson)


Defendant

Gala E. Dunn
(Office of the Attorney General)


Facts

Danielle Woodard sued Michael Tippett and the State of California, involving allegations of civil rights violations.

Defendant Tippett was a California Highway Patrol Officer.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
On May 12, 2015, while plaintiff was on her way home from work, defendant Tippett, who was initially driving behind plaintiff in a marked CHP vehicle, pulled up next to plaintiff and motioned her to roll down her window. Defendant then asked plaintiff to pull over so defendant could ask her some questions. Plaintiff complied. Defendant told plaintiff that he could not see the vehicle's VIN. Thereafter, defendant put handcuffs on plaintiff and placed her in his patrol car. Then, without provocation, defendant suddenly and violently grabbed plaintiff's arms. Plaintiff was ultimately issued a citation for not having license plates on her vehicle. The whole detention took 90 minutes and, in the process, plaintiff sustained injuries as a result. In this lawsuit, plaintiff asserted causes of action for violation of her civil rights under color of state law and battery.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants denied the allegations and asserted various affirmative defenses.

Result

The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Ultimately, the district court granted the defendants' motion, and Woodard's complaint was dismissed with prejudice.


#124995

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390