Paul DePace v. Alan Harris, Marcella Harris
Published: Apr. 12, 2008 | Result Date: Jan. 25, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: SC081361 Verdict – Liability Only
Court
L.A. Superior Central
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Dean A. Olson
(Clark Hill LLP)
Defendant
Ty S. Vanderford
(Vanderford & Ruiz LLP)
Experts
Plaintiff
Glenn D. Tofani
(technical)
Gary Applegate
(technical)
John Dereamer
(technical)
Robert Amoroso
(technical)
Defendant
Randy Roy
(technical)
Tim Lindsay
(technical)
Wayne Schick
(technical)
Facts
Paul DePace, a homeowner and plaintiff, noticed that cracks had formed on the upper slope of Alice and Marcella Harris' property in Hollywood Hills, defendants. Although plaintiff had notified the Los Angeles Department of Planning and Safety of the cracks, inspectors had deemed the slope stable. Plaintiff did not contact the Harrises about the cracks.
On Nov. 29, 2003, the 50-foot rocky slope collapsed, crushing plaintiff's home. The plaintiff sued defendants.
The plaintiff's experts testified that plaintiff's trees did not cause the collapse. Rather, plaintiff's expert stated that unabated water intrusion caused the gravel to decompose. The plaintiff also introduced evidence from defendants' neighbors who claimed they warned the defendants that the slope was unstable. The Harrises denied they were warned.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff argued that the collapse was caused by defendants' negligent maintenance of the upper part of the slope.
DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
The defendants counterclaimed, arguing that the bottom of the slope belonged to plaintiff, and that the collapse was caused by plaintiff planting ten cypress trees at the base of the slope. The defendants argued that the only loss of land caused was the unstable ledge that was outside of the defendants' property.
Damages
The plaintiff asked for $2.4 million for the loss of his house. The defendants counterclaimed for the costs of repair for the slope, $275,000, and future repair costs in the amount of $600,000.
Result
The plaintiff settled his claims against the defendants for an undisclosed amount. With respect to defendants' counterclaim, the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff, finding he was not negligent in maintaining the lower part of the slope.
Deliberation
45 minutes
Poll
12-0
Length
two weeks
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390