This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Product Liability
Wrongful Death

Loloma Vaea, et al. v. General Motors Corporation

Published: Feb. 28, 1998 | Result Date: Jan. 26, 1998 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BCV01286 Verdict –  $0

Judge

Robert H. Wallerstein

Court

San Bernardino Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Alan K. Nicolette
(Nordstrom Steele Nicolette and Blythe)

Joseph W. Steele

Francis P. Papica


Defendant

Philip R. Cosgrove
(Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough LLP)

Dommond E. Lonnie
(Dykema Gossett PLLC)


Experts

Plaintiff

Simon Tamny
(technical)

Defendant

Douglas Lane
(technical)

Gerald Cooper
(technical)

Al Wilinski
(technical)

Facts

On Aug. 23, 1993, at approximately 10 p.m., plaintiff Loloma Vaea, was driving a 1992 Chevrolet Lumina APV in the northbound No.1 lane of Interstate 15 in San Bernardino, at approximately 60 mph. After the plaintiff passed a tractor trailer truck, plaintiff and the other occupants of the vehicle smelled an odor of burning rubber caused by a tire tread separation. The plaintiff applied the brakes and turned the steering wheel which caused the van to slide off the roadway and roll over in the desert. During the rollover, plaintiff's husband, decedent Paula Vaea, a 39-year-old cement mason, was ejected from the car and crushed underneath as the vehicle came to rest. The plaintiffs, the driver and eight other occupants, brought this action against the car manufacturer based on product liability, breach of warranty, negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress theories of recovery.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiffs settlement demand totaled $123,024.92. On the first day of trial, there was an indication that plaintiffs would accept $30,000. The defendant made no offer.

Specials in Evidence

$12,514.76 (total) Claimed to be in excess of $300,000 $0

Damages

Death of a husband. (Plaintiffs' injuries? ___________)

Injuries

Death of a husband. The plaintiffs suffered soft tissue injuries and a broken arm.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately three years and four months after the case was filed. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: A settlement conference was held on March 20, 1997, before Judge Arthwell Hayton resulting in no settlement.

Deliberation

30 to 40 minutes

Poll

12-0

Length

11 days


#125864

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390