This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Construction Contract
Breach of Contract

Contra Costa Electric v. Roebbelen Construction

Published: Mar. 5, 1998 | Result Date: Jan. 7, 1998 |

Case number: C9500142 Verdict –  $743,198

Judge

John F. Van de Poel

Court

Contra Costa Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Wayne V.R. Smith


Defendant

Margaret A. Seltzer

David A. Riegels


Facts

In 1992, the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) awarded the construction contract of the Chevron water reclamation plant in Richmond to Roebbelen Construction. Roebbelen retained Contra Costa Electric as the electrical subcontractor. Completion of the job was delayed 10 months. EBMUD granted 71 days of time extensions for excusable delays and deducted $904,000 for the remaining days of delay from Roebbelen. Contra Costa Electric filed this action to enforce a stop notice in 1995, because it had not been paid for work done. Roebbelen filed a cross-complaint for $8 million against EBMUD for delay damages. EBMUD filed a cross-complaint against Roebbelen for breach of contract, and in 1997, filed causes of action against Roebbelen for fraud. Per EBMUD, in 1996, Roebbelen and Contra Costa Electric entered into a claims prosecution agreement releasing each other from claims, and providing that Contra Costa would only collect from Roebbelen for the damages prayed for in the complaint if Roebbelen recovered those damages from EBMUD on its cross-complaint.

Settlement Discussions

According to plaintiff, it made a settlement demand for $600,000 and defendants made an offer of $325,000. Per cross-defendant EBMUD, it made a C.C.P. º998 settlement demand for $440,000 to defendant Roebbelen.

Damages

The plaintiff reported it claimed $850,000 in damages. Cross-defendant EBMUD reported that plaintiff claimed $743,198 in damages for which defendant Roebbelen stipulated to judgment because Roebbelen claimed damages should be "passed through" to EBMUD via Roebbelen's cross-complaint. Also per EBMUD, Roebbelen sought $3,844,754 on its cross-complaint against EBMUD. Cross-defendant EBMUD sought to retain the $904,000 of liquidated damages as well as other miscellaneous deductions of $228,808 deducted under the contract.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately three years after the case was filed. MEDIATION: A mediation was held on Sept. 10, 1996, before Randy Wulff, Esq., and Michael B. Shane, Esq., resulting in no settlement.

Deliberation

varied reports: three hours to one day

Poll

12-0

Length

varied reports: 17-24 days


#126285

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390