Nations Title Company of California v. Security Union Title Insurance Company dba Pacific Coast Title Company, Michael Lowther, Wayne Diaz, Tony Becker, Phil Jauregui
Published: Jun. 6, 2013 | Result Date: May 18, 2013 |Case number: BC426001 Verdict – Defense
Court
L.A. Superior Central
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Maxwell M. Blecher
(Blecher, Collins & Pepperman PC)
Defendant
Michael G. King
(Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP)
Jennifer M. Millier
(Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP)
Facts
On June 1, 2009, title officer Tony Becker left Nations Title and started working for Pacific Coast Title. Within weeks, approximately one dozen employees followed Mr. Becker from Nations Title to Pacific Coast Title and numerous customers switched their business from Nations Title to Pacific Coast Title.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff Nations Title Company of California claimed that employees Tony Becker, Phil Jauregui, and others conspired to orchestrate the nearly simultaneous departure of approximately one dozen employees, and several thousand open orders, from plaintiff to defendant Pacific Coast Title. Plaintiff alleged that the former employees' actions breached their contracts, their fiduciary duties, and that all defendants intentionally interfered with Nation's prospective economic relations.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants claimed that all employees were at-will, owed no fiduciary duties, and that the departure of approximately one dozen employees evidenced a poor working environment, not a conspiracy. Defendants' re-opening of some orders previously opened with plaintiff was done only with the customers' consent – i.e., there was no intentional interference with plaintiff's economic relations, but simply fair competition for customers.
Settlement Discussions
Defendants Becker and Pacific Coast made a CCP 998 offer of approximately $151,000 before trial, which was not accepted.
Damages
Plaintiff sought approximately $1.8 million in damages against all defendants, and punitive damages against defendants Becker and Jauregui.
Result
Defense verdict. On a special verdict, the jury found there was no breach of contract, no intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, and no breach of fiduciary duty by any defendant and, accordingly, found against plaintiff and for defendants.
Other Information
Defendants plan to file Motions for Attorney Fees under a contractual provision and California's trade secret statute.
Deliberation
2.5 hours
Poll
10-2
Length
11 days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390