This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Intentional Interference With Prospective Economic Advantage

Nations Title Company of California v. Security Union Title Insurance Company dba Pacific Coast Title Company, Michael Lowther, Wayne Diaz, Tony Becker, Phil Jauregui

Published: Jun. 6, 2013 | Result Date: May 18, 2013 |

Case number: BC426001 Verdict –  Defense

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Maxwell M. Blecher
(Blecher, Collins & Pepperman PC)

Theo G. Arbucci

Howard K. Alperin


Defendant

Michael G. King
(Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP)

Eric L. Davis

Jennifer M. Millier
(Hennelly & Grossfeld LLP)

Douglas J. Suter

Robert B. Port


Facts

On June 1, 2009, title officer Tony Becker left Nations Title and started working for Pacific Coast Title. Within weeks, approximately one dozen employees followed Mr. Becker from Nations Title to Pacific Coast Title and numerous customers switched their business from Nations Title to Pacific Coast Title.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff Nations Title Company of California claimed that employees Tony Becker, Phil Jauregui, and others conspired to orchestrate the nearly simultaneous departure of approximately one dozen employees, and several thousand open orders, from plaintiff to defendant Pacific Coast Title. Plaintiff alleged that the former employees' actions breached their contracts, their fiduciary duties, and that all defendants intentionally interfered with Nation's prospective economic relations.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants claimed that all employees were at-will, owed no fiduciary duties, and that the departure of approximately one dozen employees evidenced a poor working environment, not a conspiracy. Defendants' re-opening of some orders previously opened with plaintiff was done only with the customers' consent – i.e., there was no intentional interference with plaintiff's economic relations, but simply fair competition for customers.

Settlement Discussions

Defendants Becker and Pacific Coast made a CCP 998 offer of approximately $151,000 before trial, which was not accepted.

Damages

Plaintiff sought approximately $1.8 million in damages against all defendants, and punitive damages against defendants Becker and Jauregui.

Result

Defense verdict. On a special verdict, the jury found there was no breach of contract, no intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, and no breach of fiduciary duty by any defendant and, accordingly, found against plaintiff and for defendants.

Other Information

Defendants plan to file Motions for Attorney Fees under a contractual provision and California's trade secret statute.

Deliberation

2.5 hours

Poll

10-2

Length

11 days


#127652

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390