Jimmy J. Suh v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc.
Published: May 31, 2019 | Result Date: Apr. 17, 2019 | Filing Date: Apr. 18, 2018 |Case number: FINRA: 18-01422 Arbitration – Expungement
Attorneys
Claimant
Eric Litow
(HLBS Law)
Respondent
Andrew M. DeLucia
(Rubin, Fortunato & Harbison PC)
Facts
Jimmy Suh filed an arbitration claim against Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc. in relation to a termination disclosure on his Form U5.
Contentions
CLAIMANT'S CONTENTIONS: Suh alleged the information disclosed on his Form U5 was defamatory and sought expungement of the termination disclosure containing the information. Specifically, Suh claimed the information was false, defamatory, misleading, inaccurate, or erroneous. Suh also sought amendment to the reason for termination on his Form U5 to read voluntary, and expungement of the reason for termination on his BrokerCheck Report. In addition, Suh requested amendment of answers to Questions 7B, 7E(2), 7F(1), and 7F(2) on his Form U5 to no, and deletion of the accompanying Internal Review and Termination Disclosure Reporting Pages.
RESPONDENT'S CONTENTIONS: Respondent denied the allegations and raised various affirmative defenses.
Result
The panel recommended expungement of the Termination Explanation of the Form U5, and suggested a new explanation that explained Suh approved a subordinate's corporate credit card expensing in a way inconsistent with the firm's standards, and use of an unapproved application on his personal cell phone to communicate with associates on non-business matters. The panel stated the reason for termination would remain the same Further, the panel recommended the answer to Question 7F(1) be changed to no on Suh's Form U5 and the accompanying Disclosure Reporting Page be deleted.
Other Information
ARBITRATORS: Normal Michael Garland, David Harrison, Richard M. Norman
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390