This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Breach of Warranty
Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act

Nicole and Guy Mael, Nadine Vigliano, Britney Morea, Carol Conway, Angela Bertucci, and Tina Wiepert, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Evanger's Dog and Cat Food Co. Inc., Nutripack LLC, Against The Grain Pet Foods, Sher Services Company Inc.

Published: Apr. 3, 2020 | Result Date: Oct. 25, 2019 |

Case number: 3:17-cv-05469-RBL Settlement –  $545,500

Court

USDC Western Washington


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Beth E. Terrell
(Terrell Marshall Law Group PLLC)

Jennifer R. Murray
(Terrell Marshall Law Group PLLC)

Jessica J. Sleater
(Andersen Sleater Sianni LLC)


Defendant

John C. Graffe
(Johnson, Graffe, Keay, Moniz & Wick LLP)

Katherine A. Bozzo
(Johnson, Graffe, Keay, Moniz & Wick LLP)

William J. Brown Jr.
(Brown Wegner LLP)

William E. Wegner
(Brown Wegner LLP)

Gregory A. Bedell
(Knabe & Bedell)


Facts

Consumers that purchased Evanger's Hunk of Beef, Evanger's Braised Beef, or Against the Grain Pulled Beef with Gravy between Dec. 1, 2015 and June 30, 2017, brought a class action suit against the pet food manufacturer, Evanger's.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs alleged that the pet food was dangerous to animals because it contained poisonous ingredients. Plaintiffs contended that defendant's products contained dangerous chemicals that were commonly used to euthanize animals and execute humans. Plaintiffs further contended that their pets exhibited neurological symptoms after eating defendant's food and that at least one of their dogs died after eating the food.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied the contentions.

Result

The parties agreed to a $545,500 settlement. Class members with proof of purchase may collect a cash payment of up to 25 percent of the value of their purchase. Members may also elect to collect merchandise certificates valued at up to 50 percent of the purchased product's value.

Other Information

JUDGE: Hon. Ronald B. Leighton.


#134359

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390