Personalized Media Communications LLC v. Google LLC
Published: Dec. 24, 2020 | Result Date: Nov. 6, 2020 | Filing Date: Mar. 21, 2019 |Case number: USDC TEXAS: 2:19-cv-00090-JRG Verdict – Defense
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Arun Subramanian
(Susman Godfrey LLP)
Tamar E. Lusztig
(Susman Godfrey LLP)
Joseph S. Grinstein
(Susman Godfrey LLP)
Dmitry Kheyfits
(Kheyfits Belenky LLP)
Andrey Belenky
(Kheyfits Belenky LLP)
S. Calvin Capshaw
(Capshaw DeRieux LLP)
Defendant
Charles K. Verhoeven
(Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)
Andrew J. Bramhall
(Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)
Carl Gunnar Anderson
(Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)
David A. Perlson
(Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)
Dawn M. David
(Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)
Felipe Corredor
(Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)
Andrew T. Dufresne
(Perkins Coie LLP )
Dan L. Bagatell
(Perkins Coie LLP )
Facts
Plaintiff Personalized Media Communications, LLC owns patents related to adaptive video streaming, which allows content providers to serve users with high quality videos over the internet. Ten years ago, defendant Google, LLC and PMC attempted to negotiate a deal for Google to license plaintiff's patents. However, Google never licensed any of plaintiff's patents. Plaintiff later filed a complaint against Google for patent infringement.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendant infringed plaintiff's patents by using it in Google products such as YouTube, YouTube Premium, YouTube Movies & Shows and Google's Content Distribution Network without a proper license.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied plaintiff's contentions. Defendant contended that none of the PMC patents were infringed.
Result
The jury rendered a verdict in favor of defendant.
Other Information
JUDGE: Hon. Rodney Gilstrap.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390