This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.


Consumer Law
Fraud
Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices

Larry Clapp, Mary Jones, Daryl McCleary, and Robin McGuire, on ) behalf of themselves and all others ) similarly situated v. Accordia Life and Annuity Company, Alliance-One Services Inc.

Published: Feb. 26, 2021 | Result Date: Jun. 23, 2020 | Filing Date: Apr. 20, 2017 |

Case number: USDC Illinois: 2:17-cv-02097-CSB-EIL Settlement –  Restitution

Attorneys

Plaintiff

Irwin B. Levin
(Cohen & Malad LLP)

Richard E. Shevitz
(Cohen & Malad LLP)

Lynn A. Toops
(Cohen & Malad LLP)

Vess A. Miller
(Cohen & Malad LLP)

Stephen M. Williams
(Law Office of Stephen M. Williams)


Defendant

Jason H. Gould
(Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP)

Kristen Reilly
(Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP)


Facts

Plaintiffs Larry Clapp, Mary Jones, Daryl McCleary, and Robin McGuire filed a class action lawsuit against Defendants Accordia Life Annuity Company and Alliance-One Services, Incorporated, for conversion-related issues that were the result of moving the administration of new and existing insurance policies to a new electronic system.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended in 2013, about a half a million insurance policies were purchased by Accordia, and Accordia hired Defendant Alliance-One to administer and service the policies. Plaintiff contended in 2015, Defendant Alliance-One attempted to transfer the policies from one administrative system to another, known as the conversion process, but soon problems quickly arose. Specifically, Plaintiffs contended as a result of the conversion process related issues, many policies were placed on restricted status, which left the policy essentially frozen and no transactions could be completed for years. Further Plaintiffs contended during the conversion period, Defendants stopped automatically withdrawing or accepting premium payments, which caused lapsed policies and an inability to provide policyholders with information related to the statuses of their policies.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied Plaintiffs' contentions.

Result

The parties agreed to settle for refunds of bank overdraft fees directly caused by disruptions or errors in policy billing, adjustments for incorrect payments or charges, partial or full waivers of any other payments or charges due on the covered policy, refunds to implement nonforfeiture status reversals, and other forms of relief.

Other Information

JUDGE: Hon. Colin S. Bruce


#136668

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390