This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Securities
Unfair Business Practices
False or Unsubstantiated Efficacy Claims

Federal Trade Commission v. Agora Financial LLC, NewMarket Health LLC, NewMarket Health Publishing LLC, Health Sense Media LLC, Health Sense Publishing LLC, Dr. Richard Gerhauser, Zachary Scheidt

Published: Mar. 19, 2021 | Result Date: Feb. 8, 2021 | Filing Date: Oct. 24, 2019 |

Case number: USDC Maryland: 1:19-cv-03100-SAG Settlement –  $2,000,000

Attorneys

Plaintiff

Omolara B. Joseney
(Federal Trade Commission)

Gregory J. Madden
(Federal Trade Commission)

Dillon J. Lappe
(Federal Trade Commission)


Defendant

William M. Krulak Jr.
(Miles & Stockbridge)

Joshua J. Gayfield
(Miles & Stockbridge)

Megan J. McGinnis
(Miles & Stockbridge)

Ari N. Rothman
(Venable LLP)


Facts

The Federal Trade Commission sued a Baltimore-based publisher and its affiliates for pamphlets and other publications the publisher made and distributed to its consumers. The FTC filed its complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief pursuant to section 13(b) of the FTC Act.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendants produced and distributed pamphlets targeted at their elderly consumers. They falsely marketed certain books as well, including "The Doctor's Guide to Reversing Diabetes in 28 Days," as simple and scientifically proven to cure type 2 diabetes in less than a month. They also defrauded consumers into investing thousands of dollars into dividend-paying stocks that did not result in the promised returns. Defendants misrepresentations were a violation of the FTC Act and there were liable for the sales that resulted from those misrepresentations.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied the contentions but agreed to settle the claims asserted in lieu of litigation.

Result

The court approved a $2,000,000 settlement and injunction between the parties. Defendants were found to have made misrepresentations to elderly consumers. Therefore, the injunction also prohibited defendants from making further misrepresentations concerning their programs' health benefits or efficacy.


#136700

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390