This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Antitrust
Price Fixing

In re: Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation

Published: Apr. 2, 2021 | Result Date: Feb. 17, 2021 | Filing Date: Feb. 7, 2012 |

Case number: 2:12-md- 02311; COURT: USDC Eastern Michigan Settlement –  $1,400,000

Attorneys

Plaintiff

Steven A. Kanner
(Freed, Kanner, London & Millen LLC)

William H. London
(Freed, Kanner, London & Millen LLC)

Michael E. Moskovitz
(Freed, Kanner, London & Millen LLC)

Joseph C. Kohn
(Kohn, Swift & Graf, PC)

William E. Hoese
(Kohn, Swift & Graf, PC)

Douglas A. Abrahams
(Kohn, Swift & Graf, PC)

Eugene A. Spector
(Spector, Roseman & Kodroff PC)

William G. Caldes
(Spector, Roseman & Kodroff PC)

Jeffrey L. Spector
(Spector, Roseman & Kodroff PC)

Gregory P. Hansel
(Preti, Flaherty, Beliveau & Pachios, Chartered, LLP)

Randall B. Weill
(Preti, Flaherty, Beliveau & Pachios, Chartered, LLP)


Defendant

Jeremy J. Calsyn
(Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton LLP)


Facts

Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, both individually and on behalf of a class of direct purchasers of Power Window Switches, filed a class action lawsuit against Defendant Nidec Mobility Corporation, formerly known as Omron Automotive Electronics Co., Ltd, for the Sherman Act and antitrust violations.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended they were injured as a result of NMOJ's participation in an unlawful conspiracy to raise, fix, maintain, and/or stabilize prices, rig bids, and allocate markets and customers for Power Window Switches in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. Specifically, Plaintiffs contended Defendant Nidec Mobility had worked to raise and fix prices on power window switches, which violated the Sherman Act.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied Plaintiffs' contentions and asserted affirmative defenses.

Result

Defendant Nidec Mobility Corp. agreed to pay $1.4 million.

Other Information

Related Cases: In Re: Switches Cases; Case Number: Case Nos. 2:13-cv-01301 and 2:17-cv-12338 in the USDC Eastern District of Michigan JUDGE: Hon. Sean F. Cox.


#136893

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390