This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Declaratory Relief
Nuisance
Injunction

Reed v. Selby Corporation

Published: May 10, 1997 | Result Date: Apr. 18, 1997 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CIV156683 –  $44,144

Judge

Jerome Berenson

Court

Ventura Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Dennis LaRochelle
(Arnold LaRochelle Mathews VanConas & Zirbel LLP)


Defendant

Bruce Alan Finck


Experts

Plaintiff

Charles Hilsman
(technical)

Lindsay F. Nielson
(technical)

Charles Swift
(technical)

Defendant

James Boles
(technical)

Mike Woodyard
(technical)

Glenn C. Hawks
(technical)

Facts

The plaintiffs Howard and Margaret Reed, the 81- and 82-year-old owners of industrial land, claimed that defendant Selby Corp. improperly maintained an abandoned cement quarry and that the quarry operation had radically altered the hillside and drainage pattern. The plaintiffs claimed that due to the increase of water and mud runoff their adjacent land was flooded with water and silt. The defendant refused to take remedial measures. The plaintiffs sought injuctive relief and cost of cleanup.

Settlement Discussions

Per the plaintiffs, they made a settlement demand that remedial measures to be taken and the defendant measures but failed to do so. Per the defendant, the plaintiffs made a settlement demand for $175,000 and the defendant made a settlement offer of $40,000.

Damages

The plaintiffs sought injunctive relief and clean-up expenses and the cost of building protective walls totalling $44,144, plus loss of value of property and emotional distress.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately one year and nine months after the case was filed. A mediation was held on Apr. 18, 1996 before Judge Robert Soavas, retired. The plaintiffs claimed the mediation resulted in the defendant promising to obtain a grading permit and commence remedial measures, but that the defendant failed to do so, requiring trial of the matter. Complex issues of law and fact, concerning hydrology and drainage history going back to the turn of the century led Judge Berenson to order the parties ot submit a written argument at the end of the case instead of the usual oral argument.

Length

11 days


#79489

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390