This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Dangerous Condition
Mountain Bike

Brian Spillane v. Team Big Bear Mountain Bike Inc., USA Cycling Inc., Snow Summit Inc. dba Big Bear Mountain Resorts, Snow Summit Ski Corporation

Published: Jan. 21, 2006 | Result Date: Dec. 20, 2005 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: SCVSS116038 –  $0

Court

San Bernardino Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Thomas C. Knowles
(Van Blois Law )

R. Lewis Van Blois
(Van Blois Law)


Defendant

Kathleen M. Bragg

Stephen L. Hewitt
(Hewitt & Raphael)

Anthony J. Ellrod
(Manning & Kass Ellrod Ramirez Trester LLP)

Steven R. Parminter
(Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP)

Henry C. Truszkowski
(Hewitt & Truszkowski)


Facts

This lawsuit arises out of injuries plaintiff Brian Spillane sustained while taking part in the "Gotta Thunder Downhill" mountain bike race on June 7, 2003, at Big Bear. The plaintiff allegedly struck a course delineator constructed of fixed metal rebar covered by PVC tubing, causing him to crash. The fixed metal rebar was directly next to the approach to a jump.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff claimed that the use of fixed metal rebar covered by PVC tubing to delineate the mountain bike race course was negligent and created a dangerous condition. Race courses outside of the U.S. use break away or flexible course delineators to reduce injuries to participants.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
The defendants contended that they were not negligent, and that even if they were the plaintiff's action was barred by any one of a number of releases that the plaintiff signed prior to the race, and that the plaintiff's action was barred under the doctrine of primary assumption of risk.

Damages

As a result of this incident, the plaintiff is now a paraplegic who has limited use of his shoulder.

Injuries

As a result of this incident, the plaintiff is now a quadriplegic.

Result

Summary Judgment for the defense. The trial court denied the defendants' motions for summary judgment. The defendants then petitioned the Court of Appeal for a writ of mandate, which was accepted. The Court of Appeal then issued a writ of mandate ordering the Superior Court to vacate its order denying summary judgment and issue a new order granting summary judgment on all grounds.

Other Information

PLEASE PROVIDE THE COURT OF VENUE


#81384

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390