Grace Perlas v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District
Published: Oct. 27, 2007 | Result Date: Apr. 24, 2007 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: RG04181378 Verdict – Defense
Court
Alameda Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Tanya R. Meyers
(Law Offices of Tanya R. Meyers)
Defendant
Facts
Grace Perlas was promoted from a temporary position at the Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) to a civil rights officer for the Office of Civil Rights (OCR). She alleged the OCR subjected her to acts of discriminatory misconduct based on gender and failed to accommodate her disability of work-related stress. Perlas also claimed executive management retaliated against her for complaining about the discriminatory treatment perpetuated by a new OCR manager hired in 2002. Perlas sued BART for employment discrimination and retaliatory termination.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff contended Davis cultivated an intimidating environment in which he specifically harassed plaintiff, gave her more work, and threatened to fire her for refusing to condone his discriminatory conduct. The defendant eventually terminated her after refusing to provide her proper accommodation for complaining about management's retaliation and misconduct.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendant contended the plaintiff was laid off due to downsizing after an extended leave of absence brought about by plaintiff's alleged stress. Although plaintiff submitted a doctor's note suggesting one month away from work, she did not return to work as scheduled. In fact, her psychiatrist continually extended her return date, month by month, until 2004. Further, the defendant did not fire plaintiff in retaliation, but was compelled to eliminate her position in its legitimate effort to reduce its budget for the fiscal year.
The district contended that the reduction in force was necessitated by budget reductions due to the downturn in the Bay Area economy after the tragic events of September 11.
Damages
The plaintiff's total compensation was about $93,000 for 2004, including earnings, benefits and bonus. After her employment benefits were terminated, plaintiff could not find similar coverage and incurred $2,000 in medical expenses, not including costs for medication.
Injuries
Emotional distress.
Result
Defense.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390