This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Oral Agreement

Barbara Henslee dba Realog Logging LLC, Ronald W. Elliott v. United Pacific Services Inc., Gus P. Franklin, Developer Surety and Indemnity Company, Does 1 Through 10 Inclusive

Published: Oct. 27, 2007 | Result Date: Aug. 13, 2007 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: GIN052390 Bench Decision –  $333,074

Court

San Diego Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Alan L. Mohill


Defendant

Michael Drury


Facts

Plaintiff Barbara Henslee, dba Realog Logging, was assigned two oral subcontracts from plaintiff Ronald Elliott, who had subcontracted with defendant United Pacific Services Inc. to cut and haul away dead trees in the Palmar Mountains.

The county of San Diego had awarded the contracts to defendant. One of the contracts was for $575,000 and the other for $920,000. Under the terms of the contracts, a timber operators license was required. Defendant United Pacific did not have a license, and plaintiff Elliott's had been suspended. Plaintiff Henslee's company had a license.

Plaintiff Realog filed suit against defendant and its bond issuer, alleging breach of contract and quantum meruit. Plaintiff sought one-third of the contract funds pursuant to an oral agreement.

The defendant contested the claims, asserting that plaintiff operated illegally without a contractor's license. The defendant counterclaimed, contending that plaintiff Elliott and defendant's president, Gus Franklin, agreed that Elliott would pay for logs that were taken from the mountain. However, plaintiff Realog, plaintiff Elliott's assignee, never furnished the wood.

Damages

After plaintiff received a partial payment of $200,000, it sought an additional $256,000, claiming it was entitled to that amount under the oral contract. Defendant sought $173,000 in its counterclaim, claiming unjust enrichment connected to the value of the trees.

Result

The defendant was granted a motion to bifurcate the case. During the first phase, the court concluded that the subcontract was not illegal, and the terms of the oral agreement were insufficiently defined to enforce an oral contract. In the second phase, the court found in favor of plaintiff Realog, awarding it over $333,000 based on quantum meruit. With regard to the cross-complaint, the court found the trees did not have any value and found for plaintiffs.


#81671

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390