This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Patent Infringement
Permanent Injunction

Celerity Inc. v. Ultra Clean Technology Systems & Service Inc.

Published: Oct. 27, 2007 | Result Date: Jun. 25, 2007 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:05-cv-03560-MMC Verdict –  $13,900

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Keith L. Slenkovich

Robert E. Camors Jr.

Richard S. Swope


Defendant

Amy Sun

Paul Joseph Andre
(Kramer, Levin, Naftalis & Frankel LLP)

James R. Hannah
(Kramer, Levin, Naftalis & Frankel LLP)

Lisa Kobialka
(Kramer, Levin, Naftalis & Frankel LLP)

Sean M. Boyle


Experts

Plaintiff

Alexander D. Glew
(technical)

Mark Berkman
(technical)

Defendant

Aubrey L. Helms
(technical)

Steven A. Velinsky
(technical)

Nelson Urdaneta
(technical)

Facts

Plaintiff Celerity Inc. is a Milpitas-based company that provides advanced gas panels and instruments for use with semi-conductor manufacturing equipment. The plaintiff sent letters to defendant Ultra Clean Technology Systems & Service Inc., claiming that the company had infringed upon plaintiff's patents.

The defendant contended that its product, Predator IGS, did not infringe upon plaintiff's patents. Further, according to defendant, plaintiff's patents were invalid.

Damages

Plaintiff sought $13,900, which was comparable to an eight percent royalty rate on all of defendant's Predator IGS sales.

Result

The jury found that defendant's product infringed on one of plaintiff's patented modular gas delivery technologies, but did not infringe on the other patent. The patents were not found to be invalid. Plaintiff was awarded $13,900.

Deliberation

two days

Poll

7-0

Length

three weeks


#81675

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390