This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Auto v. Auto
Lane Change Collision

Harry Ha v. Unnamed Cable Service Provider

Published: Nov. 10, 2007 | Result Date: Jul. 18, 2007 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: Confidential Settlement –  $550,000

Court

San Francisco Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Andrew H. Meisel
(Meisel Law Group)


Defendant

Robert G. Harrison


Experts

Plaintiff

David C. Bradshaw M.D.
(medical)

Barry Ben-Zion Ph.D.
(technical)

Maria I. Toyofuku
(technical)

Kyle D. Bickel
(medical)

Roger P. Friedenthal
(medical)

Defendant

John O. Missirian
(medical)

Carol R. Hyland M.A.
(technical)

Facts

In May 2005, plaintiff Harry Ha was driving southbound on the 101 freeway in San Francisco. A commercial van belonging to a cable service company suddenly swerved from another lane, colliding with plaintiff's vehicle, causing it to overturn several times.

The defendant, the driver of the van, was in the course and scope of his duties when he collided with plaintiff's vehicle.

The plaintiff sued the driver and his employer, an unnamed cable service provider, for negligence.

The defendants contended plaintiff was at fault because he made an unsafe lane change which led to the accident.

Specials in Evidence

Plaintiff sought $35,000. The plaintiff sought $580,000 in future lost wages. The defendant argued that plaintiff's employer had no plans to release plaintiff from his position as a machine operator. Further, even if plaintiff were to lose his job because of his physical limitations, he would be able to find employment as a dispatcher and earn wages comparable to a machine operator.

Damages

The plaintiff claimed unspecified amounts for past and future pain and suffering.

Injuries

At the hospital, plaintiff registered a Glasgow coma score of 15 and suffered from sternum pain, abrasions to his left arm and hand, a degloving injury to his right index and middle fingers, a fractured vertebra at T12, and a lacerated kidney. According to a rehabilitation expert, plaintiff had sustained a 60 percent loss of grip strength in his right hand with permanent loss of range of motion. Further, plaintiff would be unable to work in fields requiring repeated hand or arm movement and the full gripping of objects. As a result, plaintiff's earning capacity dropped from $17.50 an hour to $9 an hour.

Result

The parties reached a settlement, the terms of which require defendant to pay plaintiff $550,000.


#81729

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390