This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Sexual Harassment
Retaliation

Johnston Ghiotto, Chad Allison, Jason Hewitt, Alexander Kane v. City of San Diego, City of San Diego Fire-Rescue Department

Published: Apr. 18, 2009 | Result Date: Feb. 17, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 37-2007-00073878-CU-CR-CTL Verdict –  $34,300

Court

San Diego Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Joseph Infranco

Teresa L. Mendoza
(LiMandri & Jonna LLP)

Charles S. LiMandri
(LiMandri & Jonna LLP)


Defendant

Donald F. Shanahan
(Office of the San Diego City Attorney)

Kristin Marie J. Zlotnik
(Office of the San Diego City Attorney)


Facts

On July 21, 2007, defendant City of San Diego Fire-Rescue Department (SDFD) participated in a gay pride parade in San Diego, California. SDFD ordered its employee-firefighters, including plaintiffs John Ghiotto, Jason Hewitt, Alex Kane, and Chad Allison, to participate. The plaintiffs were all Christians. Plaintiffs sued SDFD for retaliation and failure to prevent sexual harassment.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiffs contended that they objected to participating in the event on religious grounds but were told that they would be disciplined if they did not participate. The plaintiffs argued that they were harassed and retaliated against as a result of their objection to the event. Hewitt stated that he was given poor performance reviews as a result of his objection. The plaintiffs found that they experienced sexual harassment when lewd comments were directed at them during the event.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
SDFD countered that there was no sexual harassment as there was never any physical touching nor were they made to feel threatened. SDFD denied that the plaintiffs suffered any retaliation or harassment as a result of their objection to participating in the event.

Damages

The plaintiffs sought $14,300 in economic damages plus damages for emotional distress.

Injuries

The plaintiffs claimed emotional distress.

Result

The jury found in favor of the plaintiffs in the amount of $34,300 on the failure to prevent sexual harassment claim, but found in favor of the defense on the retaliation claim. This was the second trial. In the first trial in Sept. 2008, the jury hung on the sexual harassment claim.

Deliberation

2.5 days

Poll

12-0 on some questions, 9-3 on others

Length

three weeks


#82048

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390