Dulces Topi S.A. de C.V. v. Mandisa L.A. Inc.
Published: Apr. 18, 2009 | Result Date: Feb. 9, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 07CV01581(SGL) Bench Decision – $500,000
Court
USDC Eastern
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Jacqueline Kojikian
(Diederich & Associates)
Defendant
Experts
Plaintiff
William J. Flynn
(Neyhart, Anderson, Flynn & Grosboll)
(technical)
Facts
Dulces Topi S.A. de C.V. (Dulces) is a Mexican corporation that manufactures candies and other sweets. Mandisa L.A. Inc. is a distributor. On Jan. 10, 2007, Dulces entered into an agreement with Mandisa, which required that Dulces sell Mandisa a minimum number of containers of candy. Dulces later sued Mandisa for breach of contract.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Dulces claimed that Mandisa failed to purchase the minimum number of candies as required by the contract. Further, Dulces asserted that Mandisa digitally or mechanically altered reports that showed Mandisa had made additional orders that Dulces had failed to fulfill.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant denied plaintiff's allegations and contended that Dulces breached the contract.
Damages
The plaintiff requested $500,000.
Result
The court awarded the plaintiff $500,000.
Other Information
FILING DATE: Dec. 4, 2007.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390