This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Purchase Agreement

Dulces Topi S.A. de C.V. v. Mandisa L.A. Inc.

Published: Apr. 18, 2009 | Result Date: Feb. 9, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 07CV01581(SGL) Bench Decision –  $500,000

Court

USDC Eastern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jacqueline Kojikian
(Diederich & Associates)


Defendant

Glenn A. Besnyl


Experts

Plaintiff

William J. Flynn
(Neyhart, Anderson, Flynn & Grosboll) (technical)

Facts

Dulces Topi S.A. de C.V. (Dulces) is a Mexican corporation that manufactures candies and other sweets. Mandisa L.A. Inc. is a distributor. On Jan. 10, 2007, Dulces entered into an agreement with Mandisa, which required that Dulces sell Mandisa a minimum number of containers of candy. Dulces later sued Mandisa for breach of contract.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Dulces claimed that Mandisa failed to purchase the minimum number of candies as required by the contract. Further, Dulces asserted that Mandisa digitally or mechanically altered reports that showed Mandisa had made additional orders that Dulces had failed to fulfill.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant denied plaintiff's allegations and contended that Dulces breached the contract.

Damages

The plaintiff requested $500,000.

Result

The court awarded the plaintiff $500,000.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Dec. 4, 2007.


#82062

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390