This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property
Landlord and Tenant
Redevelopment, Civil Rights, Breach of Habitability

Alexandria Tenants, Los Angeles Community Action Network v. Alexandria Housing Partners, L.P., Logan Property Management, City of Los Angeles, Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles

Published: May 2, 2009 | Result Date: Feb. 12, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CV-07-08262 MMM Settlement –  $1,000,000

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Louis Rafti

Barbara J. Schultz
(Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles)

Andrea Luquetta

Saje Reeves

Matthew X. Oster
(Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin LLP)

Shawna L. Parks
(Law Office of Shawna L. Parks)

Patrick Dunlevy


Defendant

Deborah J. Fox
(Meyers Nave APC)

Rockard J. Delgadillo

Christine Baran
(Fisher & Phillips LLP)

Robert D. Infelise
(Cox Castle & Nicholson LLP)


Facts

Six current and four former residents of the Alexandria Hotel sued the hotel for disability discrimination, civil rights violations and violations of redevelopment and habitability laws.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiffs asserted that hotel owner Alexandria Housing Partners (AHP) evicted over a hundred individuals and other tenants suffered constructive eviction due to shutoffs of heat, water, and elevators. Further, AHP denied reasonable accommodations and sought to replace long-term tenants with non-elderly, non-disabled, non-African American tenants. City and the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) defendants funded hotel owner's unlawful actions and violated redevelopment law.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The hotel owner claimed that the hotel evicted tenants due to failure to pay rent and drug involvement, and that the hotel complied with all applicable laws. The city and CRA contended that this was not a city or redevelopment sponsored project and that no state or federal law was violated.

Result

The parties settled for injunctive relief including various revisions to relocation, disability and affirmative marketing policies. The city and CRA will offer settlement monies to certain eligible tenants. The total monetary package for damages and attorney fees was just under $1,000,000. The court will retain jurisdiction for three years while plaintiffs monitor defendants' actions.


#82080

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390