Sussex Financial Enterprises Inc. v. Bayerische Hypo-Und Vereinsbank AG, aka Hypovereinsbank; HVB Risk Management Products Inc.; HVB U.S. Finance Inc. fka HVB Structured Finance Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Published: Sep. 11, 2010 | Result Date: Aug. 20, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 3:08-cv-04791-SC Summary Judgment – Defense
Court
USDC Northern
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Steven J. Brady
(Brady Law Group)
Defendant
Mark P. Ressler
(Kasowitz, Benson & Torres LLP)
Ronald R. Rossi
(Rossi, Hamerslough, Reischl & Chuck)
Facts
Defendant Bayerische Hypo-Und Vereinsbank AG (HVB) served as a lender in transactions entered into by plaintiff Sussex Financial Enterprises Inc, which provided a financial product, Custom Adjustable Rate Debt Structure (CARDS), to high-income clients.
Sussex filed suit against HVB alleging fraud and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Sussex contended that HVB made misrepresentations to Sussex in the CARDS negotiations, stating it intended to renew loans for thirty years, and that Sussex never would have entered into an agreement with HVB had it known HVB planned to recall the loans after a year.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
HVB contended that Sussex could not prove it justifiably relied on HVB's promise of loan renewal because HVB's alleged statements were inadmissible as contradictory to the terms of their agreement. HVB alleged that the agreement between the parties gave it the right not to renew the loans after the first year.
Result
The court granted summary judgment in favor of HVB, finding Sussex had not shown it justifiably relied on HVB's representations.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390