This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Race Discrimination
Reverse Discrimination

Philip Andrew Mounts v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Published: May 26, 2012 | Result Date: Sep. 12, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 08CECG01820 Verdict –  Defense

Court

Fresno Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Monrae L. English
(Wild, Carter & Tipton APC)


Defendant

Connie A. Broussard
(Broussard Law)

Shanna M. Thomas


Experts

Plaintiff

James P. Braun
(technical)

Facts

In 2006, Andrew Mounts applied for a promotion as a Parole Agent II with the California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation (Department), having been a Parole Agent I specializing in serious sex offender tracking since 2001. The position was given to Ronald Sims, who worked in a different unit with a general caseload.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Mounts filed suit against the Department, alleging racial discrimination. He contended that he was more qualified for the position than Sims, but that Sims had been given the position due to race.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The Department denied the allegations, contending that Sims was qualified for the position and his promotion was not based on race. The Department contended that Sims and Mounts had similar employment history, Sims exhibited better leadership qualities, and Sims had an advantage by holding a criminology degree versus Mounts' business degree. In addition, Sims performed better in his interview than Mounts.

Damages

Mounts sought $23,000 in damages for lost earnings as well as damages for emotional distress.

Result

The jury rendered a verdict for the defense.

Deliberation

one day

Poll

12-0

Length

three weeks


#82496

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390